Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Assessing the Impact of Differential Genotyping Errors on Rare Variant Tests of Association

Authors
Journal
PLoS ONE
1932-6203
Publisher
Public Library of Science
Publication Date
Volume
8
Issue
3
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056626
Keywords
  • Research Article
  • Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Population Genetics
  • Genetics
  • Heredity
  • Genotypes
  • Genetics Of Disease
  • Genomics
  • Genome Analysis Tools
  • Genome-Wide Association Studies
  • Genome Sequencing
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
Disciplines
  • Biology
  • Design

Abstract

Genotyping errors are well-known to impact the power and type I error rate in single marker tests of association. Genotyping errors that happen according to the same process in cases and controls are known as non-differential genotyping errors, whereas genotyping errors that occur with different processes in the cases and controls are known as differential genotype errors. For single marker tests, non-differential genotyping errors reduce power, while differential genotyping errors increase the type I error rate. However, little is known about the behavior of the new generation of rare variant tests of association in the presence of genotyping errors. In this manuscript we use a comprehensive simulation study to explore the effects of numerous factors on the type I error rate of rare variant tests of association in the presence of differential genotyping error. We find that increased sample size, decreased minor allele frequency, and an increased number of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) included in the test all increase the type I error rate in the presence of differential genotyping errors. We also find that the greater the relative difference in case-control genotyping error rates the larger the type I error rate. Lastly, as is the case for single marker tests, genotyping errors classifying the common homozygote as the heterozygote inflate the type I error rate significantly more than errors classifying the heterozygote as the common homozygote. In general, our findings are in line with results from single marker tests. To ensure that type I error inflation does not occur when analyzing next-generation sequencing data careful consideration of study design (e.g. use of randomization), caution in meta-analysis and using publicly available controls, and the use of standard quality control metrics is critical.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.