Affordable Access

Publisher Website

How good is the evidence base for test selection in clinical guidelines?

Clinica Chimica Acta
Publication Date
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2014.01.040
  • Guidelines
  • Test Selection
  • Evidence-Based
  • Quality
  • Audit
  • Medicine


Abstract Clinical guidelines are ubiquitous, manifold and form an integral component of evidence-based clinical practice. Guidelines on test selection are often considered a useful adjunct to aid clinical decision-making, as test selection is a complex process that is influenced by many patient, clinician and laboratory factors. However, it is important to carefully evaluate several aspects of these guidelines, which include the context of the test in the guideline, the quality of the studies underpinning recommendations, the extent of the evaluation of effectiveness (or performance) of the specific test and in the clinical pathway, its applicability and ease of implementation. A robust evaluation of a diagnostic test should incorporate several stages including evaluation in healthy, symptomatic but unaffected and affected populations, and importantly a measurement of impact on patient outcomes. Few diagnostic studies meet these criteria, and therefore crucial aspects of test evaluation are overlooked prior to incorporation into clinical guidelines. Whilst efforts are made to standardise reporting of studies, strength of evidence and quality of guidelines, further work is required to improve the quality of the diagnostic studies that formulate these guidelines. It is important that clinicians using guidelines for test selection appreciate the limitations of the diagnostic test, and the guidelines themselves.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

How good is my test?

on Journal of dental education August 1988

Evidence-based medicine: how good is the evidence?

on The Medical Journal of Austral... Mar 19, 2001
More articles like this..