Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Anything negatives can do affirmatives can do just as well, except for some metaphors

Authors
Journal
Journal of Pragmatics
0378-2166
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
38
Issue
7
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2005.12.006
Keywords
  • Negation
  • Suppression
  • Retention
  • Mitigation
  • Emphatic Effects
  • Relevance
Disciplines
  • Linguistics

Abstract

Abstract In this study I look into some of the functions people believe are specific to negation vis-à-vis affirmation in order to question the asymmetry between the two, which is the received view prevalent among many formal linguists, pragmatists, and psycholinguists (see, Horn 1989; Clark and Clark, 1977). On the assumption that “[m]uch of the speculative, theoretical, and empirical work on negation over the last twenty-three centuries has focused on the relatively marked or complex nature of the negative statement vis-à-vis its affirmative counterpart” (Horn, 1989:xiii), I examine here the extent to which negation is indeed pragmatically different from affirmation. Based on findings from both naturally occurring and laboratory data, I argue against an asymmetrical view of negation and affirmation (for a different view, see Horn, 1989:201). The pragmatic and functional similarity found here between negation and affirmation can be explained only by higher level processing mechanisms that are governed by pragmatic sensitivity (Giora, 1985; Sperber and Wilson, 1986/1995).

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

If I can do anything....

on The American journal of nursin... February 1986

Anything you can do...

on Nature Apr 17, 2003

Do something ... anything.

on Texas medicine October 1997
More articles like this..