Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Spina bifida occulta: Lesion or anomaly?

Authors
Journal
Clinical Radiology
0009-9260
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
36
Issue
2
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(85)80100-8
Disciplines
  • Medicine

Abstract

Failure of fusion of the posterior arches of the lumbosacral spine above S3 was sought on frontal radiographs of 653 patients attending an accident and emergency (A & E) department. The patients were aged from 2 months to 98 years and represent all those with relevant information discharged as A & E outpatients over a 2-year period. Presenting complaints of backache or enuresis and inadequate radiographs were excluded. Spina bifida occulta was diagnosed in 22% of the whole group. The incidence was much higher in those below the age of 40 years (29.2%) compared with those above (9.8%). The overall age-adjusted incidence was 17.3%. Our study is an attempt to judge the ‘off-the-street’ prevalence of spina bifida occulta. It supports the notion that spina bifida occulta is a common anomaly, of no clinical significance on its own.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Spina bifida occulta: lesion or anomaly?

on Clinical Radiology March 1985

Spina bifida occulta.

on South African medical journal... Apr 22, 1978

[Spina bifida occulta].

on Ryōikibetsu shōkōgun shirī... 2000

[Spina bifida occulta].

on Maandschrift voor kindergenees... October 1952
More articles like this..