Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size

Authors
Journal
The American Journal of Cardiology
0002-9149
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
84
Issue
7
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00446-4
Disciplines
  • Mathematics

Abstract

Abstract Although the anteroposterior dimension of the left atrium is universally used in clinical practice and research, we hypothesized that it may be an inaccurate surrogate for volume because its use is based on the unlikely assumption that there is a constant relation among atrial dimensions. The following measurements of the left atrium were made at end ventricular systole: (1) M-mode–derived anteroposterior linear dimension from the parasternal long-axis view; (2) digitized planimetry of the left atrial (LA) cavity from the apical 4-chamber view; and (3) digitized planimetry of the LA cavity from the apical 2-chamber view. The following volume calculations were obtained from these digital measurements: (1) volume derived from the M-mode dimension assuming a spherical shape; (2) volume derived from the single plane area-length of apical 4-chamber view, which assumes that LA geometry can be generalized from a single 2-dimensional plane; and (3) volume derived from the biplane method of discs. The correlation coefficient between the M-mode and biplane methods of determining LA volume was r = 0.76. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods is −25 ± 33 ml. The correlation coefficient between the single plane apical 4-chamber and biplane methods of determining LA volume is r = 0.97. The mean difference (±2 SDs) between these methods was −5.0 ± 12 ml, indicating good agreement. The M-mode measure of the left atrium is an inaccurate representation of its size. Two-dimensional–derived LA volumes provide a more accurate measure of the true size of the left atrium and are more sensitive to changes in LA size. When an echocardiographic measure of LA size is made either in an individual patient or as a variable in a research study, the M-mode measure should be avoided.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Best method in clinical practice and in research s...

on The American Journal of Cardio... Oct 01, 1999

Clinical signs and left atrial size in cats with c...

on The Journal of small animal pr... January 2012

What Is the Best Approach for the Assessment of Le...

on Journal of the American Societ... Jan 01, 2006

What is the best approach for the assessment of le...

on Journal of the American Societ... August 2006
More articles like this..