Affordable Access




Aumann (1976) put forward a formal definition of common knowledge and used it to prove that two ""like minded"" individuals cannot ""agree to disagree"" in the following sense. If they start from a common prior and update the probability of an event E (using Bayes'' rule) on the basis of private information, then it cannot be common knowledge between them that individual 1 assigns probability p to E and individual 2 assigns probability q to E with p ¹ q. In other words, if their posteriors of event E are common knowledge then they must coincide. Aumann''s Agreement Theorem has given rise to a large literature which we review in this paper. The results are classified according to whether they are probabilistic (Bayesian) or qualitative. Particular attention is paid to the issue of how to interpret the notion of Harsanyi consistency as a (local) property of belief hierarchies.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.


Seen <100 times

More articles like this

Agreeing to disagree.

on Nature Cell Biology August 2006

Agreeing to disagree.

on General dentistry 2005

Agreeing to disagree.

on MLO: medical laboratory observ... April 2005
More articles like this..