Affordable Access

Publisher Website

Axial Length Measurements by Contact and Immersion Techniques in Pediatric Eyes with Cataract

Authors
Journal
Ophthalmology
0161-6420
Publisher
Elsevier
Publication Date
Volume
118
Issue
3
Identifiers
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.042
Disciplines
  • Medicine

Abstract

Purpose To compare axial length measurements by contact and immersion techniques in pediatric cataractous eyes. Design Prospective, comparative case series. Participants In this prospective study, 50 cataractous eyes of 50 children were enrolled. In bilateral cataract, only 1 eye was selected to avoid a correlation effect in statistical analyses. Methods Axial length was measured by both contact and immersion techniques for all eyes, randomized as to which to perform first to avoid measurement bias. Main Outcome Measures Axial length measured by contact and immersion techniques and the difference between contact and immersion technique axial length measurements. Results Mean age±standard deviation at cataract surgery and at axial length measurement was 3.87±3.72 years. Axial length measurement by contact technique was significantly shorter as compared with immersion technique (21.36±3.04 mm and 21.63±3.09 mm, respectively; P<0.001). Axial length measurements using the contact technique were on an average 0.27 mm shorter than those obtained using the immersion technique. Forty-two eyes (84%) had shorter axial length when measured using the contact technique as compared with the immersion technique. Lens thickness measurement by contact technique was not significantly different from that of immersion technique (3.61±0.74 and 3.60±0.67 mm, respectively; P = 0.673). Anterior chamber depth measurement was significantly more shallow with the contact technique (3.39±0.59 mm and 3.69±0.54 mm, respectively; P<0.001). Intraocular lens power needed for emmetropia was significantly different (28.68 diopters [D] vs. 27.63 D; P<0.001). Conclusions Contact A-scan measurements yielded shorter axial length than immersion A-scan measurements. This difference was mainly the result of the anterior chamber depth rather than the lens thickness value. During intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation, if axial length measured by contact technique is used, it will result in the use of an average 1-D stronger IOL power than is actually required. This can lead to induced myopia in the postoperative refraction. Financial Disclosure(s) The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

There are no comments yet on this publication. Be the first to share your thoughts.

Statistics

Seen <100 times
0 Comments

More articles like this

Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length...

on Journal of Cataract & Refracti... Jan 01, 2003

Contact versus immersion biometry of axial length...

on Journal of cataract and refrac... November 2003

A comparison of immersion and contact techniques f...

on Journal - American Intra-Ocula... 1984
More articles like this..